Section 5.2 Proving Set Relationships
Beginning Activity Beginning Activity 1: Working with Two Specific Sets
Let1.
List at least four different positive elements of
2.
Use the roster method to specify the sets
3.
Use set builder notation to specify the sets
4.
Using appropriate definitions, describe what it means to say that an integer
5.
In order to prove that
Complete the know-show table in Table 5.11 for the proposition that
This table is in the form of a proof method called the choose-an-element method. This method is frequently used when we encounter a universal quantifier in a statement in the backward process. (In this case, this is Step
Step | Know | Reason |
are multiples of 6. |
Hypothesis | |
Let |
Choose an arbitrary element of |
|
Definition of “multiple” | ||
|
|
|
Step |
||
Definition of “subset” | ||
Step | Show | Reason |
Beginning Activity Beginning Activity 2: Working with Venn Diagrams
1.
Draw a Venn diagram for two sets,
2.
Draw a general Venn diagram for two sets,
Subsection The Choose-an-Element Method
The method of proof we will use in this section can be called the choose-an-element method. This method was introduced in Beginning Activity 1. This method is frequently used when we encounter a universal quantifier in a statement in the backward process. This statement often has the formFor each element with a given property, something happens.Since most statements with a universal quantifier can be expressed in the form of a conditional statement, this statement could have the following equivalent form:
If an element has a given property, then something happens.We will illustrate this with the proposition from Beginning Activity 1. This proposition can be stated as follows:
Let S be the set of all integers that are multiples of 6, and let T be the set of all even integers. Then S is a subset of T.In Beginning Activity 1, we worked on a know-show table for this proposition. The key was that in the backward process, we encountered the following statement:
Each element ofIn this case, the “element” is an integer, the “given property” is that it is an element ofis an element of or, more precisely, if then
Whenever we choose an arbitrary element with a given property, we are not selecting a specific element. Rather, the only thing we can assume about the element is the given property.It is important to realize that once we have chosen the arbitrary element, we have added information to the forward process. So in the know-show table for this proposition, we added the statement, “Let
Proposition 5.12.
Let S be the set of all integers that are multiples of 6, and let T be the set of all even integers. Then S is a subset of T.
Proof.
Let
Let
Since
By closure properties of the integers,
Progress Check 5.13. Subsets and Set Equality.
Let
(a)
Is the set
The set
Since
(b)
Is the set
The set
Progress Check 5.14. Using the Choose-an-Element Method.
The Venn diagram in Beginning Activity 2 suggests that the following proposition is true.
Proposition 5.15.
Let
(a)
The conclusion of the conditional statement is
(b)
Complete the following know-show table for this proposition and explain exactly where the choose-an-element method is used.
Step | Know | Reason |
Hypothesis | ||
Let |
Choose an arbitrary element of |
|
If |
Definition of “subset” | |
If |
||
Definition of “subset” | ||
Step | Show | Reason |
Step | Know | Reason |
Hypothesis | ||
Let |
Choose an arbitrary element of |
|
If |
Definition of “subset” | |
If |
Contrapositive | |
If |
Step of “complement” |
|
The element |
Steps |
|
Every element of |
The choose-an-element method with Steps |
|
Definition of “subset” |
Subsection Proving Set Equality
One way to prove that two sets are equal is to use Theorem 5.4 and prove each of the two sets is a subset of the other set. In particular, letProposition 5.16.
Let
Proof.
Let
First, let
We know that an element is in
This means that
We note that
Since we have proved that
Progress Check 5.17. Set Equality.
Prove the following proposition. To do so, prove each set is a subset of the other set by using the choose-an-element method.
Proposition 5.18.
Let
Proof.
Let
To prove that
Subsection Disjoint Sets
Earlier in this section, we discussed the concept of set equality and the relation of one set being a subset of another set. There are other possible relationships between two sets; one is that the sets are disjoint. Basically, two sets are disjoint if and only if they have nothing in common. We express this formally in the following definition.Definition.
Let
IfIf we would like to prove this proposition, a reasonable “backward question” is, “How do we prove that a setthen
IfIf we choose to prove the contrapositive or use a proof by contradiction, we will assume thatthen
The contrapositive of “If
then ” is, “If then ” So in this case, we would assume and try to proveUsing a proof by contradiction, we would assume
and assume that From these two assumptions, we would attempt to derive a contradiction.
Proposition 5.20.
Let
Proof.
Let
IfSo assume thatthen
Since
Now, the fact that
This means that
The proof that if
Progress Check 5.21. Proving Two Sets Are Disjoint.
Proof: It has been noted that it is often possible to prove that two sets are disjoint by using a proof by contradiction. In this case, we assume that the two sets are not disjoint and hence, their intersection is not empty. Use this method to prove that the following two sets are disjoint.
Proof.
Let
By equating these two expressions for
Subsection A Final Comment
We have used the choose-an-element method to prove Proposition 5.12, Proposition 5.16, and Proposition 5.20. Proofs involving sets that use this method are sometimes referred to as element-chasing proofs. This name is used since the basic method is to choose an arbitrary element from one set and “chase it” until you prove it must be in another set.Exercises Exercises
1.
Let
(a)
Is
The set
(b)
Is
The set
2.
Let
(a)
Draw a Venn diagram with
(b)
Prove the following proposition:
Ifand then
Note: This may seem like an obvious result. However, one of the reasons for this exercise is to provide practice at properly writing a proof that one set is a subset of another set. So we should start the proof by assuming that
3.
Let
(a)
List at least five different elements of the set
(b)
Is
To prove that
(c)
Is
4.
Let
(a)
List at least five different elements of the set
(b)
Is
(c)
Is
5.
In each case, determine if
(a)
We will prove that
(b)
(c)
The last equation implies that 5 divides 6, and this is a contradiction.
6.
To prove the following set equalities, it may be necessary to use some of the properties of positive and negative real numbers. For example, it may be necessary to use the facts that:
The product of two real numbers is positive if and only if the two real numbers are either both positive or both negative.
The product of two real numbers is negative if and only if one of the two numbers is positive and the other is negative.
For example, if
Use the choose-an-element method to prove each of the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
7.
Let
(a)
Let
(b)
Let
(c)
(d)
(e)
By Theorem 5.3,
(f)
8.
Let
For all setsand that are subsets of some universal set if and only if
9.
Is the following proposition true or false? Justify your conclusion with a proof or a counterexample.
For all setsand that are subsets of some universal set the sets and are disjoint.
10.
Complete the proof of Proposition 5.20 by proving the following conditional statement:
Letand be subsets of some universal set. If then .
Start with, “Let
11.
Let
(a)
If
(b)
If
12.
Let
(a)
If
Let
(b)
If
13.
Let
(a)
If
(b)
If
(c)
If
(d)
If
(e)
If
14.
Prove the following proposition:
For all setsand that are subsets of some universal set, if and then
15.
Are the following biconditional statements true or false? Justify your conclusion. If a biconditional statement is found to be false, you should clearly determine if one of the conditional statements within it is true and provide a proof of this conditional statement.
(a)
For all subsets
This is Proposition 5.20. (See Exercise 10.)
(b)
For all subsets
To prove “If
(c)
For all subsets
(d)
For all subsets
(e)
For all subsets
16.
Let
and
(a)
Using assumption (i), what conclusion(s) can be made if it is known that
(b)
Using assumption (ii), what conclusion(s) can be made if it is known that
(c)
Using all three assumptions, either prove that
17. Evaluation of Proofs.
See the instructions for Exercise 19 from Section 3.1.
(a)
- Proposition
Let
and be subsets of some universal set. If and then- Proof
We assume that
and are subsets of some universal set and that and This means that there exists an element in that is not in and there exists an element that is in and not in Therefore, and and we have proved that
(b)
- Proposition
Let
and be subsets of some universal set. If then- Proof
-
We assume that
and will prove that We will first prove thatSo let
If then and hence, From this we can conclude that If then and hence, However, since we may conclude that Therefore,The proof that
may be done in a similar manner. Hence,
(c)
- Proposition
Let
and be subsets of some universal set. If and then- Proof
Assume that
and Since there exists an element such that and Since we may conclude that Hence, and and we have proved that
Activity 30. Using the Choose-an-Element Method in a Different Setting.
We have used the choose-an-element method to prove results about sets. This method, however, is a general proof technique and can be used in settings other than set theory. It is often used whenever we encounter a universal quantifier in a statement in the backward process. Consider the following proposition.
Proposition 5.22.
Let a, b, and t be integers with
(a)
Whenever we encounter a new proposition, it is a good idea to explore the proposition by looking at specific examples. For example, let
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(b)
Repeat Task 30.a with
Notice that the conclusion of the conditional statement in this proposition involves the universal quantifier. So in the backward process, we would have
The “elements” in this sentence are the integersFor all integers and divides
and are integers with divides and divides \item Let and let
(c)
Complete the following proof of Proposition 5.22.
Proof.
Let
So let