In a proof by mathematical induction, we “start with a first step” and then prove that we can always go from one step to the next step. We can use this same idea to define a sequence as well. We can think of a sequence as an infinite list of numbers that are indexed by the natural numbers (or some infinite subset of ). We often write a sequence in the following form:
Another way to define a sequence is to give a specific definition of the first term (or the first few terms) and then state, in general terms, how to determine in terms of and the first terms . This process is known as definition by recursion and is also called a recursive definition. The specific definition of the first term is called the initial condition, and the general definition of in terms of and the first terms is called the recurrence relation. (When more than one term is defined explicitly, we say that these are the initial conditions.) For example, we can define a sequence recursively as follows:
In Beginning Activity 1 in Section 4.2, for each natural number , we defined , read factorial, as the product of the first natural numbers. We also defined to be equal to 1. Now recursively define a sequence of numbers as follows:
Compare the values of , and with those of , and . What do you observe? We will use mathematical induction to prove a result about this sequence in Exercise 1.
In words, the recursion formula states that for any natural number with , the Fibonacci number is the sum of the two previous Fibonacci numbers. So we see that
Record any other observations about the values of the Fibonacci numbers or any patterns that you observe in the sequence of Fibonacci numbers. If necessary, compute more Fibonacci numbers.
The Fibonacci numbers form a famous sequence in mathematics that was investigated by Leonardo of Pisa (1170 — 1250), who is better known as Fibonacci. Fibonacci introduced this sequence to the Western world as a solution of the following problem:
Suppose that a pair of adult rabbits (one male, one female) produces a pair of rabbits (one male, one female) each month. Also, suppose that newborn rabbits become adults in two months and produce another pair of rabbits. Starting with one adult pair of rabbits, how many pairs of rabbits will be produced each month for one year?
Since we start with one adult pair, there will be one pair produced the first month, and since there is still only one adult pair, one pair will also be produced in the second month (since the new pair produced in the first month is not yet mature). In the third month, two pairs will be produced, one by the original pair and one by the pair which was produced in the first month. In the fourth month, three pairs will be produced, and in the fifth month, five pairs will be produced.
The basic rule is that in a given month after the first two months, the number of adult pairs is the number of adult pairs one month ago plus the number of pairs born two months ago. This is summarized in Table 4.14, where the number of pairs produced is equal to the number of adult pairs, and the number of adult pairs follows the Fibonacci sequence of numbers that we developed in Beginning Activity 2.
Historically, it is interesting to note that Indian mathematicians were studying these types of numerical sequences well before Fibonacci. In particular, about fifty years before Fibonacci introduced his sequence, Acharya Hemachandra (sometimes spelled Hemchandra) (1089 — 1173) considered the following problem, which is from the biography of Hemachandra in the MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive 7 .
Suppose we assume that lines are composed of syllables which are either short or long. Suppose also that each long syllable takes twice as long to articulate as a short syllable. A line of length contains units where each short syllable is one unit and each long syllable is two units. Clearly a line of length units takes the same time to articulate regardless of how it is composed. Hemchandra asks: How many different combinations of short and long syllables are possible in a line of length ?
This is an important problem in the Sanskrit language since Sanskrit meters are based on duration rather than on accent as in the English Language. The answer to this question generates a sequence similar to the Fibonacci sequence. Suppose that is the number of patterns of syllables of length . We then see that and . Now let be a natural number and consider pattern of length . This pattern either ends in a short syllable or a long syllable. If it ends in a short syllable and this syllable is removed, then there is a pattern of length , and there are such patterns. Similarly, if it ends in a long syllable and this syllable is removed, then there is a pattern of length , and there are such patterns. From this, we conclude that
This actually generates the sequence 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, …. For more information about Hemachandra, see the article “Math for Poets and Drummers” by Rachel Wells Hall in the February 2008 issue of Math Horizons.
We will continue to use the Fibonacci sequence in this book. This sequence may not seem all that important or interesting. However, it turns out that this sequence occurs in nature frequently and has applications in computer science. There is even a scholarly journal, The Fibonacci Quarterly, devoted to the Fibonacci numbers.
The sequence of Fibonacci numbers is one of the most studied sequences in mathematics, due mainly to the many beautiful patterns it contains. Perhaps one observation you made in Beginning Activity 2 is that every third Fibonacci number is even. This can be written as a proposition as follows:
For each natural number is an even natural number .
As with many propositions associated with definitions by recursion, we can prove this using mathematical induction. The first step is to define the appropriate open sentence. For this, we can let be, “ is an even natural number.”
The key question now is, “Is there any relation between and ?” We can use the recursion formula that defines the Fibonacci sequence to find such a relation.
The recurrence relation for the Fibonacci sequence states that a Fibonacci number (except for the first two) is equal to the sum of the two previous Fibonacci numbers. If we write , then we get . For , the two previous Fibonacci numbers are and . This means that
We have already defined the predicate to be used in an induction proof and have proved the basis step. Use the information in and after the preceding know-show table to help prove that if is even, then is even.
We will use a proof by induction. For each natural number , we let be, is an even natural number.
Since , we see that is true and this proves the basis step.
For the inductive step, we let be a natural number and assume that is true. That is, assume that is an even natural number. This means that there exists an integer such that
.(35)
We need to prove that is true or that is even. Notice that and, hence, . We can now use the recursion formula for the Fibonacci numbers to conclude that
.
Using the recursion formula again, we get . Putting this all together, we see that
(36)
We now substitute the expression for in equation (35) into equation (36). This gives
This preceding equation shows that is even. Hence it has been proved that if is true, then is true and the inductive step has been established. By the Principle of Mathematical Induction, this proves that for each natural number , the Fibonacci number is an even natural number.
This is a recursive definition for a geometric sequence with initial term and (common) ratio . The basic idea is that the next term in the sequence is obtained by multiplying the previous term by the ratio . The work in Beginning Activity 1 suggests that the following proposition is true.
For each , the term is a (finite) geometric series with initial term and (common) ratio . The work in Beginning Activity 1 suggests that the following proposition is true.
Let . If the sequence is defined by and for each ,, then for each ,. That is, the geometric series is the sum of the first terms of the corresponding geometric sequence.
The proof of Theorem 4.18 is Exercise 7. The recursive definition of a geometric series and Theorem 4.18 give two different ways to look at geometric series. Theorem 4.18 represents a geometric series as the sum of the first terms of the corresponding geometric sequence. Another way to determine the sum of a geometric series is given in Theorem 4.19, which gives a formula for the sum of a geometric series that does not use a summation.
Let be, “ is a multiple of 3.” Since , is true. If is true, then there exists an integer such that . We now need to prove that is true or that is a multiple of 3. We use the following:
We now use the assumption that and the last equation to obtain and hence, . Therefore, is a multiple of 3 and this completes the proof of the inductive step.
Let be, “.” For the basis step, we notice that and and hence, is true. For the inductive step, we need to prove that if is true, then is true. That is, we need to prove that if , then . To do this, we can use
(This part is optional, but it may help with the induction proof in Task 4.c.) Work with the relation and substitute the expressions for and from Task 4.a Rewrite the expression as a single fraction and then in the numerator use and a similar equation involving . Now prove that .
Prove Theorem 4.18. Let . If the sequence is defined by and for each ,, then for each ,. That is, the geometric series is the sum of the first terms of the corresponding geometric sequence.
The Lucas numbers are a sequence of natural numbers , which are defined recursively as follows:
and , and
For each natural number ,.
List the first 10 Lucas numbers and the first ten Fibonacci numbers and then prove each of the following propositions. The Second Principle of Mathematical Induction may be needed to prove some of these propositions.
Let be, “.” First, verify that and are true. Now let be a natural number with and assume that ,, …, are all true. Since and are both assumed to be true, we can use them to help prove that must then be true as follows:
Use the result in Exercise 19, previously proven results from Exercise 18, or mathematical induction to prove each of the following results about Lucas numbers and Fibonacci numbers.
Let be the th Fibonacci number, and let be the positive solution of the equation . So . For each natural number ,.
Proof
We will use a proof by mathematical induction. For each natural number , we let be, “.”
We first note that is true since and . We also notice that is true since and, hence, .
We now let be a natural number with and assume that ,, … , are all true. We now need to prove that is true or that .
Since and are true, we know that and . Therefore,
.
We now use the fact that and the preceding inequality to obtain
This proves that if ,, … , are true, then is true. Hence, by the Second Principle of Mathematical Induction, we conclude that for each natural number ,.
Assume that dollars is deposited in an account that has an interest rate of for each compounding period. A compounding period is some specified time period such as a month or a year. For each integer with , let be the amount of money in an account at the end of the th compounding period. Then
Write the recurrence relation in Task 25.b so that it is in the form of a recurrence relation for a geometric sequence. What is the initial term of the geometric sequence and what is the common ratio?
Activity26.The Future Value of an Ordinary Annuity.
For an ordinary annuity, dollars is deposited in an account at the end of each compounding period. It is assumed that the interest rate, , per compounding period for the account remains constant. Let represent the amount in the account at the end of the th compounding period. is frequently called the future value of the ordinary annuity. So . To determine the amount after two months, we first note that the amount after one month will gain interest and grow to . In addition, a new deposit of dollars will be made at the end of the second month. So
By recognizing this as a recursion formula for a geometric series, use Theorem 4.19 to determine a formula for in terms of ,, and that does not use a summation. Then show that this formula can be written as
What is the future value of an ordinary annuity in 20 years if $200 dollars is deposited in an account at the end of each month where the interest rate for the account is 6% per year compounded monthly? What is the amount of interest that has accumulated in this account during the 20 years?