Section 5.3 Properties of Set Operations
Beginning Activity Beginning Activity 1: Exploring a Relationship between Two Sets
Let1.
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
2.
Based on the Venn diagrams in Exercise 1, what appears to be the relationship between the sets
3.
Use one of De Morgan's Laws (Theorem 2.12 to explain carefully what it means to say that an element
4.
What does it mean to say that an element
5.
Explain carefully what it means to say that an element
6.
Compare your response in Exercise 3 to your response in Exercise 5. Are they equivalent? Explain.
7.
How do you think the sets
Beginning Activity Beginning Activity 2: Proving that Statements Are Equivalent
1.
Let
2.
Assume that
If
thenIf
thenIf
then
Explain why each of the following statements is true.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Remember that
Subsection Algebra of Sets — Part 1
This section contains many results concerning the properties of the set operations. We have already proved some of the results. Others will be proved in this section or in the exercises. The primary purpose of this section is to have in one place many of the properties of set operations that we may use in later proofs. These results are part of what is known as the algebra of sets or as set theory.Theorem 5.23.
Let
If
then and
Proof.
The first part of this theorem was included in Exercise 7 from Section 5.2. The second part of the theorem was Exercise 12 from Section 5.2.
Theorem 5.24. Algebra of Set Operations.
Let
- Properties of the Empty Set and the Universal Set
- Idempotent Laws
- Commutative Laws
- Associative Laws
- Distributive Laws
We can use this to prove that two sets are equal by choosing an element from one set and chasing the element to the other set through a sequence of “if and only if” statements. We now use this idea to prove one of the commutative laws.if and only if for each
Subsection Proof of One of the Commutative Laws in Theorem 5.24
Proof.
We will prove that
However, we know that if
Now we know that
This means that we can use (40), (41), and (42) to conclude that
and, hence, we have proved that
Progress Check 5.25. Exploring a Distributive Property.
We can use Venn diagrams to explore the more complicated properties in Theorem 5.24, such as the associative and distributive laws. To that end, let
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
In our standard configuration for a Venn diagram with three sets, regions 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 are the shaded regions for both
(b)
Based on the Venn diagrams in Task 5.25.a, what appears to be the relationship between the sets
Based on the Venn diagrams in Part (1), it appears that
Subsection Proof of One of the Distributive Laws in Theorem 5.24
We will now prove the distributive law explored in Progress Check 5.25. Notice that we will prove two subset relations, and that for each subset relation, we will begin by choosing an arbitrary element from a set. Also notice how nicely a proof dealing with the union of two sets can be broken into cases.Proof.
Let
We will first prove that
So in one case, if
On the other hand, if
We next prove that
So we consider the case that
In both cases, we have proved that
Subsection Important Properties of Set Complements
The three main set operations are union, intersection, and complementation. Theorems 5.24 and Theorem 5.23 deal with properties of unions and intersections. The next theorem states some basic properties of complements and the important relations dealing with complements of unions and complements of intersections. Two relationships in the next theorem are known as De Morgan's Laws for sets and are closely related to De Morgan's Laws for statements.Theorem 5.26.
Let
- Basic Properties
-
- Empty Set and Universal Set
-
and and - De Morgan's Laws
-
- Subsets and Complements
Proof.
We will only prove one of De Morgan's Laws, namely, the one that was explored in Beginning Activty 1. The proofs of the other parts are left as exercises. Let
and
Combining (43) and (44), we see that
In addition, we know that
and this is true if and only if
and, hence, that
Progress Check 5.27.
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
Using our standard configuration for a Venn diagram with three sets, regions 1, 2, and 3 are the regions that are shaded for both
Progress Check 5.28.
It is possible to prove the relationship suggested in Progress Check 5.27 by proving that each set is a subset of the other set. However, the results in Theorems 5.24 and Theorem 5.26 can be used to prove other results about set operations. When we do this, we say that we are using the algebra of sets to prove the result. For example, we can start by using one of the basic properties in Theorem 5.26 to write
We can then use one of the commutative properties to write
Determine which properties from Theorem 5.24 and Theorem 5.26 justify each of the last three steps in the following outline of the proof that
Note: It is sometimes difficult to use the properties in the theorems when the theorems use the same letters to represent the sets as those being used in the current problem. For example, one of the distributive properties from Theorem 5.24 can be written as follows: For all sets
Subsection Proving that Statements Are Equivalent
When we have a list of three statementsTheorem 5.29.
Let
Proof.
To prove that these are equivalent conditions, we will prove that Item 1 implies Item 2, that Item 2 implies Item 3, and that Item 3 implies Item 1.
Let
To prove that Item 2 implies Item 3, we will assume that
Then, using one of De Morgan's Laws, we obtain
This completes the proof that Item 2 implies Item 3.
We now need to prove that Item 3 implies Item 1. We assume that
So let
Since we have now proved that Item 1 implies Item 2, that Item 2 implies Item 3, and that Item 3 implies Item 1, we have proved that the three conditions are equivalent.
Exercises Exercises
1.
Let
(a)
Let
(b)
(c)
Let
(d)
2.
Let
To prove that
In Case (1),
To prove that
3.
Let
4.
Let
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
(b)
Use the choose-an-element method to prove the conjecture from Task 4.a.
(c)
Use the algebra of sets to prove the conjecture from Task 4.a.
Using the algebra of sets, we obtain
5.
Let
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
(b)
Use the choose-an-element method to prove the conjecture from Task 5.a.
(c)
Use the algebra of sets to prove the conjecture from Task 5.a.
6.
Let
(a)
Using the algebra of sets, we see that
(b)
7.
Let
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
(b)
Prove the conjecture from Task 7.a.
8.
Let
(a)
Draw two general Venn diagrams for the sets
(b)
Prove the conjecture from Task 8.a.
9.
Let
(a)
Prove that
Use a proof by contradiction. Assume the sets are not disjoint and let
(b)
Prove that
10.
Let
(a)
Prove that
(b)
Prove that
11.
Let
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
12. Evaluation of Proofs.
See the instructions for Exercise 19 from Section 3.1.
(a)
- Proposition
If
and are subsets of some universal set then- Proof
(b)
- Proposition
If
and are subsets of some universal set then- Proof
-
We first write
and then use one of De Morgan's Laws to obtainWe now use the fact that
and obtain
Activity 31. Comparison to Properties of the Real Numbers.
The following are some of the basic properties of addition and multiplication of real numbers.
- Commutative Laws:
-
for all for all - Associative Laws:
-
for all for all - Distributive Law:
for all- Additive Identity
For all
- Multiplicative Identity:
For all
- Additive Inverses:
For all
- Multiplicative Inverses:
For all
with
Discuss the similarities and differences among the properties of addition and multiplication of real numbers and the properties of union and intersection of sets.