The metric space is not compact since the open cover has no finite sub-cover. Since we have already shown that is homeomorphic to the topological subspaces ,, and for any , we conclude that no open intervals are compact. Similarly, no half-closed intervals are compact. In fact, we will demonstrate in this section that the compact subsets of are exactly the subsets that are closed and bounded. The first step is contained in the next activity.
We have seen that compact sets can be either open or closed. However, in certain situations compact sets must be closed. We investigate that idea in this activity. Let be a compact subset of a Hausdorff topological space . We will examine why must be a closed set.
To classify the compact subsets of as closed and bounded, we need to discuss what it means for a set in to be bounded. The basic idea is straightforward β a subset of is bounded if it doesnβt go off to infinity in any direction. In other words, a subset of is bounded if we can construct a box in that is large enough to contain it. Thus, the following definition.
An important fact about standard -cubes is that they are compact subsets of . Compactness is a complicated property β it is difficult to prove a result that is true about every open cover. As a result, the proof of Theorem 17.10 is quite technical, but it is a critical step to classifying the compact subsets of .
We proceed by contradiction and assume that there is an and a positive real number such that is not compact. So there exists an open cover with in some indexing set of that has no finite sub-cover. Let so that is an -cube with side length . Partition into uniform sub-cubes of side length (a picture for is shown at left in Figure 17.11).
Figure17.11.Left : . Middle: . Right: Labeling the corners.
Let be one of these sub-cubes. The collection is an open cover of in the subspace topology. If each of these open covers has a finite sub-cover, then we can take the union of all of the s over all of the finite sub-covers to obtain a finite sub-cover of for . Since our cover for has no finite sub-cover, we conclude that there is one sub-cube, , for which the open cover has no finite sub-cover. Now we repeat the process and partition into uniform sub-cubes of side length . The same argument we just made tells us that there is a sub-cube of for which the open cover has no finite sub-cover (an illustration for the case is shown at middle in Figure 17.11). We proceed inductively to obtain an infinite nested sequence
For , let . That is, think of the point as a lower corner of the cube and the point as an upper corner of the -cube (a labeling for and from 1 to 3 is shown at right in Figure 17.11). Let . We will show that . Fix . We need to demonstrate that
for every and . Since is the least upper bound of all of the , property (17.2) shows that for every . Thus, and so . This shows that for every . Consequently, and is not empty. (The fact that the side lengths of our cubes are converging to 0 implies that , but we only need to know that is not empty for our proof.)
Since is a cover for , there must exist an such that . The set is open, so there exists such that . The maximum distance between points in is the distance between the corner points and , where each length is . The distance formula tells us that this maximum distance between points in is
Now choose such that . Then if we have and . So . But . So the collection is a sub-cover of for . But this contradicts the fact this open cover has no finite sub-cover. The assumption that led us to this contradiction was that was not compact, so we conclude that the standard -dimensional cube of size is a compact subset of for any .
One consequence of Theorem 17.10 is that any closed interval in is a compact set. But we can say even more β that the compact subsets of are the closed and bounded subsets. This will require one more intermediate result about closed subsets of compact topological spaces.
Now we can prove a major result, that the compact subsets of are the closed and bounded subsets. This result is important enough that it is given a name.
Let be a subset of . Assume that is closed and bounded. Since is bounded, there is a positive number such that .Theorem 17.10 shows that is compact, and then Theorem 17.12 shows that is compact.
For the converse, assume that is a compact subset of . We must show that is closed and bounded. Now is a metric space, and so Hausdorff. Theorem 17.6 then shows that is closed. To conclude our proof, we need to demonstrate that is bounded. For each , let
for each . Since , it follows that is an open cover of . The fact that is compact means that there is a finite collection ,,, of sets in that cover . Let . Then for each , and so . Thus, is bounded. This completes the proof that if is compact in , then is closed and bounded.
A subset of a metric space is bounded if there exists a real number such that for all . (This is equivalent to our definition of a bounded subset of given earlier, but works in any metric space.) Explain why as a subset of , where is the discrete metric, is closed and bounded but not compact.