Given that connectedness and path connectedness are equivalent in finite topological spaces, a reasonable question now is whether the converse of Theorem 19.10 is true in arbitrary topological spaces. As we will see, the answer is no. To find a counterexample, we need to look in an infinite topological space. There are many examples, but a standard example to consider is the topologistβs sine curve. This curve is defined as the union of the sets
To understand if is connected, let us consider the relationship between and .Figure 19.16 seems to indicate that . To see if this is true, let , and let be a neighborhood of . Then there is an such that . Choose such that , and let . Then
We know that is connected, so it remains to show that is not path connected. The sets and are connected (as continuous images of the interval and , respectively). We will prove that there is no path in from to for any point by contradiction. Assume the existence of such a path . Let and . Then
Note that is an open subset of , since . So the continuity of implies that is an open subset of . Also, the fact that means that , and the fact that means that . If we demonstrate that is an open subset of , then Equation (19.2) will imply that is not connected, a contradiction. So we proceed to prove that is open in .
Let , and so in . The set is open in . The continuity of then tells us that is open in . So there is a such that the open ball is a subset of . We will prove that . This will imply that and so is a neighborhood of each of its points, and is therefore an open set.
Every element in is mapped into by the path . The set is complicated, consisting of infinitely many sub-curves of the curve , along with points in , as illustrated in Figure 19.18. To simplify our analysis, let us consider the projection onto the -axis. The function defined by is a continuous function. Let . Since , we know that . Let . So . Since is a connected set ( is an interval), we know that is a connected set. The fact that is continuous means that is connected as well. Now is a bounded subset of , so must be a bounded interval. Recall that and so . The fact that tells us that . So . There are two possibilities for : either , or is an interval of positive length. We consider the cases.
Suppose . Then the projection of onto the -axis is the single point and as desired. Suppose that is an interval of the form or for some positive number . The structure of would indicate that there must be some gaps in the set , the projection of onto the -axis. This implies that cannot be a connected interval. We proceed to show this. In other words, we will prove that (which is impossible since ). Remember that , so let . We consider what happens if and when .
Suppose . Then the ball contains only points with value less than 1. Let so that . Then . But , and so is not in . Thus, . Thus we have found a point in .
We conclude that there can be no path in from to any point in , completing our proof that is not path connected. (In fact, the argument given shows that there is no path in from any point in to any point in .