Skip to main content

Section Path Connectedness and Connectedness in Infinite Topological Spaces

Given that connectedness and path connectedness are equivalent in finite topological spaces, a reasonable question now is whether the converse of Theorem 19.10 is true in arbitrary topological spaces. As we will see, the answer is no. To find a counterexample, we need to look in an infinite topological space. There are many examples, but a standard example to consider is the topologist’s sine curve. This curve S is defined as the union of the sets
S1={(0,y)βˆ£βˆ’1≀y≀1}  and  S2={(x,sin⁑(1x))| 0<x≀1}.
A picture of S is shown in Figure 19.16.
Figure 19.16. The topologist’s sine curve.
To understand if S is connected, let us consider the relationship between S and S2. Figure 19.16 seems to indicate that S=S2―. To see if this is true, let q=(0,y)∈S1, and let N be a neighborhood of q. Then there is an Ο΅>0 such that B=B(q,Ο΅)βŠ†N. Choose K∈Z+ such that 1arcsin⁑(y)+2Ο€K<Ο΅, and let z=1arcsin⁑(y)+2Ο€K. Then
dE(q,(z,sin⁑(1z)))=dE((0,y),(z,sin⁑(arcsin⁑(y)+2Ο€K))=dE((0,y),(z,sin⁑(arcsin⁑(y))))=dE((0,y),(z,y))=|z|<Ο΅,
and so (z,arcsin⁑(z))∈B(q,Ο΅) and every neighborhood of q contains a point in S2. Therefore, S1βŠ†S2β€²βŠ†S2― and S2―=S in S. The fact that S is connected follows from Theorem 18.8.
Now that we know that S is connected, the following theorem demonstrates that S is a connected space that is not path connected.

Proof.

We know that S is connected, so it remains to show that S is not path connected. The sets S1 and S2 are connected (as continuous images of the interval [0,1] and (0,1], respectively). We will prove that there is no path p in S from p(0)=(0,0) to p(1)=b for any point b∈S2 by contradiction. Assume the existence of such a path p. Let U=pβˆ’1(S1) and V=pβˆ’1(S2). Then
(19.2)[0,1]=pβˆ’1(S)=pβˆ’1(S1βˆͺS2)=pβˆ’1(S1)βˆͺpβˆ’1(S2)=UβˆͺV.
Note that S2 is an open subset of S, since S2=(⋃z=(x,y)∈S2B(z,x2))∩S. So the continuity of p implies that V is an open subset of [0,1]. Also, the fact that p(0)∈S1 means that Uβ‰ βˆ…, and the fact that p(1)∈S2 means that Vβ‰ βˆ…. If we demonstrate that U is an open subset of [0,1], then Equation (19.2) will imply that [0,1] is not connected, a contradiction. So we proceed to prove that U is open in [0,1].
Let x∈U, and so p(x) in S1. The set O=BS(p(x),12)∩S is open in S. The continuity of p then tells us that pβˆ’1(O) is open in [0,1]. So there is a Ξ΄>0 such that the open ball B=B[0,1](x,Ξ΄) is a subset of pβˆ’1(O). We will prove that p(B)βŠ†S1. This will imply that BβŠ†U and so U is a neighborhood of each of its points, and U is therefore an open set.
Figure 19.18. The set O.
Every element in B is mapped into O by the path p. The set O is complicated, consisting of infinitely many sub-curves of the curve S2, along with points in S1, as illustrated in Figure 19.18. To simplify our analysis, let us consider the projection onto the x-axis. The function Px:R2β†’R defined by Px(x,y)=x is a continuous function. Let I=Px(p(B)). Since p(B)βŠ†O, we know that IβŠ†Px(O). Let Z=Px(O). So IβŠ†Z. Since B is a connected set (B is an interval), we know that p(B) is a connected set. The fact that Px is continuous means that I=Px(p(B)) is connected as well. Now I is a bounded subset of R, so I must be a bounded interval. Recall that x∈B and so p(x)∈p(B). The fact that p(x)∈S1 tells us that 0=Px(p(x))∈Px(p(B))=I. So Iβ‰ βˆ…. There are two possibilities for I: either I={0}, or I is an interval of positive length. We consider the cases.
Suppose I={0}. Then the projection of p(B) onto the x-axis is the single point 0 and p(B)βŠ†S1 as desired. Suppose that I is an interval of the form [0,d] or [0,d) for some positive number d. The structure of O would indicate that there must be some gaps in the set Z, the projection of O onto the x-axis. This implies that I cannot be a connected interval. We proceed to show this. In other words, we will prove that Iβˆ–Zβ‰ βˆ… (which is impossible since IβŠ†Z). Remember that p(x)∈S1, so let p(x)=(0,q). We consider what happens if q<12 and when qβ‰₯12.
Suppose q<12. Then the ball BS(p(x),12) contains only points with y value less than 1. Let N∈Z+ so that t=1Ο€/2+2NΟ€<d. Then t∈I. But sin⁑(1t)=sin⁑(Ο€/2+2NΟ€)=sin⁑(Ο€/2)=1, and so (t,sin⁑(1t)) is not in O. Thus, tβˆ‰Z. Thus we have found a point in Iβˆ–Z.
Finally, suppose qβ‰₯12. Then the ball BS(p(x),12) contains only points with y value greater than βˆ’1. Let N∈Z+ so that t=13Ο€/2+2NΟ€<d. Then t∈I. But sin⁑(1t)=sin⁑(3Ο€/2+2NΟ€)=sin⁑(3Ο€/2)=βˆ’1, and so tβˆ‰Z. Thus we have found a point in Iβˆ–Z.
We conclude that there can be no path in S from (0,0) to any point in S2, completing our proof that S is not path connected. (In fact, the argument given shows that there is no path in S from any point in S1 to any point in S2.