Section Inverse Functions
Now that we have studied composite functions, we will move on to consider another important idea: the inverse of a function. In previous mathematics courses, you probably learned that the exponential function (with base ) and the natural logarithm functions are inverses of each other. You may have seen this relationship expressed as follows: For each with and for each
Notice that this definition does not state that is a function. Rather, is simply a subset of In Activity 2.5, we will explore the conditions under which the inverse of a function is itself a function from to
Activity 2.5.
(a)
Determine the inverse of each function as a set of ordered pairs.
(b)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(c)
Make a conjecture about what conditions on a function will ensure that its inverse is a function from to
The result of the Activity 2.5 should have been the following theorem.
Theorem 2.7.
Let and be nonempty sets, and let The inverse of is a function from to if and only if is a bijection.
The proof of Theorem 2.7 is outlined in the following activity.
Activity 2.6.
Theorem 2.7 is a biconditional statement, so we need to prove both directions. Let and be nonempty sets, and let
(a)
Assume that is a bijection. We will prove that is a function, that is that satisfies the conditions of Definition 2.1.
(i)
(ii)
(b)
(i)
What does it take to prove that is an injection? Use the fact that is a function to prove that is an injection.
(ii)
What does it take to prove that is a surjection? Use the fact that is a function to prove that is a surjection.
In the situation where is a bijection and is a function from to we can write In this case, we frequently say that is an invertible function, and we usually do not use the ordered pair representation for either or Instead of writing we write and instead of writing we write Using the fact that if and only if we can now write if and only if Theorem 2.8 formalizes this observation.
Theorem 2.8.
The next result provide useful information about inverse functions. The proofs are left for Exercise 8.
Corollary 2.9.
The next question to address is what we can say about a composition of bijections. In particular, if and are both bijections, then and are both functions. Must it be the case that is invertible and, if so, what is
Activity 2.7.
(a)
Why do we know that is invertible?
(b)
Now we determine the inverse of We might be tempted to think that is but this composite is not defined because maps to and maps to However, is defined. To prove that we need to prove that two functions are equal. How do we prove that two functions are equal?
(c)
Suppose
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
What element is Why?
(iv)
(v)
The result of Activity 2.7 is contained in the next theorem.